2026-08-10 · Soft Robotics · 28 citations
RoSE: A Robotic Soft Esophagus for Endoprosthetic Stent Testing
Dipankar Bhattacharya, Sherine Jesna V. A., Leo K. Cheng, Weiliang Xu
Published at Soft Robotics (the arXiv record still lists it as a preprint). 28 citations, 1 of them influential, as of the last refresh.
Abstract
Soft robotic systems are well suited for developing devices for biomedical applications. A bio-mimicking robotic soft esophagus (RoSE) is developed as an in vitro testing device of endoprosthetic stents for dysphagia management. Endoprosthetic stent placement is an immediate and cost-effective therapy for dysphagia caused by malignant esophageal strictures from esophageal cancer. However, later stage complications, like stent migration, could weaken swallow efficacy in the esophagus. The stent radial force (RF) on the esophageal wall is pivotal in avoiding stent migration. Due to limited randomized controlled trials in patients, stent design and stenting guidelines remain incomplete. To address this knowledge deficit, we investigate RoSE by implanting two stents (A and B) of different radial stiffness characteristics, to measure stent RF and its effect on migration. Endoscopic manometry under peristalsis is also performed to study the impact of stenting and stent dysfunction on intra-bolus pressure signatures (IBPSs) and swallowing efficacy. Each implanted stent undergoes experiments with varied peristalsis velocity, wavelength, and bolus concentrations. The results show that stiffer stent B has a higher RF, whereas stent A maintains a lower RF profile due to lesser stiffness. High RF is necessary to minimize migration under prolonged peristaltic contractions in RoSE. For manometry, stent A slightly increases IBPS, but stiffer stent B significantly decreases IBPS, especially for higher-concentration boluses. If a stiffer stent buckles, it can reduce swallow efficacy and cause recurrent dysphagia. RoSE is therefore an innovative soft robotic platform for testing endoprosthetic stents and addressing clinical challenges in stent evaluation.
arXiv comment: Author accepted manuscript. 31 pages, 13 figures, 3 tables. Published in Soft Robotics (2021). Project page: https://bhattner143.github.io/rose-stent.github.io/
Ten-minute slide kit
Six slides is the whole talk: what was broken, what people tried, what these authors did, what the numbers say, where it falls over, and the sentence people should remember.
Assembled from the paper's own PDF, parsed with its layout intact so tables and equations survive, 86,865 characters of it, then split on the paper's own section headings. Extractive, not generated: every sentence here is lifted from the paper. Check it before you present it.
Read next
Something wrong on this page? Open a correction.